People Are Now Living Longer After a Cancer Diagnosis
Milestone in cancer survival: 7 in 10 people reach the 5-year mark
- Infographic
- Text Alternative
How 5-year Relative Cancer Survival Rates (%) Changed from 1975 to 2021
Relative survival is a measure of life expectancy among people with cancer compared to that among the general population of the same age, race/ethnicity, and sex. This table shows how the 5-year relative survival rate (%) changed for 12 common cancer types all stages combined over three diagnosis periods. All survival rates improved over time except for cancer of the uterine cervix (cervical cancer) and uterine corpus (endometrial cancer). Source: Cancer Statistics 2026 Slideshow
Text Alternative for Chart
How 5-year Relative Cancer Survival Rates (%) Changed from 1975 to 2021
Relative survival is a measure of life expectancy among people with cancer compared to that among the general population of the same age, race/ethnicity, and sex. This table shows how the 5-year relative survival rate (%) changed?for 12 common cancer types over three diagnosis periods: 1975 to 1977, 1995 to 1997, and 2015 to 2021. All survival rates improved over time except for cancer in the uterine cervix (cervical cancer) and uterine corpus (endometrial cancer).?Source:?Cancer Statistics 2026 Slideshow
All Cancer Sites
5-year relative cancer survival rate for 1975 to 1977 was 49%, for 1995 to 1997 it was 63%, and for 2015 to 2021 it was 70%.
Breast Cancer (female)
5-year relative cancer survival rate for 1975 to 1977 was 75%, for 1995 to 1997 it was 87%, and for 2015 to 2021 it was 92%
Colon & Rectum
5-year relative cancer survival rate for 1975 to 1977 was 50%, for 1995 to 1997 it was 61%, and for 2015 to 2021 it was 65%
Leukemia
5-year relative cancer survival rate for 1975 to 1977 was 34%, for 1995 to 1997 it was 48%, and for 2015 to 2021 it was 68%
Liver & Intrahepatic bile duct?
5-year relative cancer survival rate for 1975 to 1977 was 3%, for 1995 to 1997 it was 7%, and for 2015 to 2021 it was 22%
Lung & bronchus
5-year relative cancer survival rate for 1975 to 1977 was 82%, for 1995 to 1997 it was 91%, and for 2015 to 2021 it was 95%
Melanoma of the skin
5-year relative cancer survival rate for 1975 to 1977 was 82%, for 1995 to 1997 it was 91%, and for 2015 to 2021 it was 95%
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
5-year relative cancer survival rate for 1975 to 1977 was 47%, for 1995 to 1997 it was 56%, and for 2015 to 2021 it was 74%
Ovary
5-year relative cancer survival rate for 1975 to 1977 was 36%, for 1995 to 1997 it was 43%, and for 2015 to 2021 it was 52%
Pancreas
5-year relative cancer survival rate for 1975 to 1977 was 3%, for 1995 to 1997 it was 4%, and for 2015 to 2021 it was 13%
Prostate
5-year relative cancer survival rate for 1975 to 1977 was 68%, for 1995 to 1997 it was 97%, and for 2015 to 2021 it was 98%
Uterine cervix?
5-year relative cancer survival rate for 1975 to 1977 was 69%, for 1995 to 1997 it was 73%, and for 2015 to 2021 it was 68%
Uterine corpus
5-year relative cancer survival rate for 1975 to 1977 was 87%, for 1995 to 1997 it was 84%, and for 2015 to 2021 it was 81%
Rate is age adjusted to 2000 US standard population and adjusted for delays in reporting. Race is exclusive of Hispanic origin.
Rates for 黑料大湿Posts Indian/Alaska Native people are restricted to Purchased/Referred Delivery Care Areas.?
Data source: North 黑料大湿Posts Association for Central Cancer Registries, 2025
Copyright 2026, 黑料大湿Posts Cancer Society, Inc., Surveillance, Prevention, and Health Services
Decades of cancer research have provided health care professionals with the tools to treat cancer more effectively, so that cancer in general is becoming less of a death sentence and more of a treatable chronic disease,?according to the 75th annual by 黑料大湿Posts Cancer Society (ACS) researchers. In the mid-1970s, the 5-year cancer survival rate was 50% and now it’s 70%, meaning that 7 in 10 people diagnosed with cancer can celebrate their 5-year diagnosis anniversary.
Improvements in survival reflect:
- Advances in treatment. For example, survival has improved for some types of leukemia because of the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors which allow most patients to have a near-normal life expectancy. Specific drugs include Gleevac (imatinib) and Sprycel (dasatinib)
- Earlier diagnosis.?Screening for breast and prostate cancer have contributed to improvements in survival.
Despite these gains in survival, however, in 2026, there will be an estimated 2.1 million new cancer cases or about 5,800 diagnoses each day.
For women, incidence is highest for breast cancer, which is diagnosed more than twice as often as second-ranking lung cancer. Incidence of liver cancer, melanoma, and cancer in the uterine corpus is also rising for women.
For men, the highest incidence is for prostate cancer, which is diagnosed twice as often as second-ranking lung cancer. And, the incidence of prostate cancer continues to increase.
Incidences of oral cavity cancer and pancreatic cancer are rising in both men and women.
Cancer is still the most common cause of death for men in the US ages 60 to 79 and women ages 40 to 79. For all ages combined, cancer is the second most common cause of death (after heart disease).?
For 2026, it’s estimated that 626,140 people in the US will die from cancer or about 1,720 deaths a day. Lung cancer will once again cause the most cancer deaths in 2026, more than second-ranking colorectal cancer and third-ranking pancreatic cancer combined.
Not sure how death rate is different from 5-year relative survival rate? Or who’s included in the AIAN group?
Glossary for Nonscientists
?
These data are from??published in the ACS flagship journal?CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians,?in its consumer-friendly companion report,?Cancer Facts & Figures 2026?,?and on the interactive website, the?.?These publications are the most widely cited source of cancer statistics in the world. Authors of the study include ACS researchers:?Rebecca Siegel, MPH,?Tyler B. Kratzer, MPH,??Nikita Sandeep Wagle, PhD, MBBS, MHA, Hyuna Sung, PhD, and?Ahmedin Jemal, DVM, PhD.?
The biggest gains in survival were for some late-stage cancers and some of the deadliest types of cancer.
In general, the more advanced a cancer is, the more complicated it can be to treat. So, it’s especially uplifting news that survival for those diagnosed with cancer not only increased for people with an early-stage diagnosis but also increased for people with metastasized tumors. Survival has improved for people with regional-stage disease (when tumors have spread from where they started to nearby organs) and distant-stage disease (where tumors have spread to organs further away from the starting point).
In fact, for all distant-stage cancers combined, the relative survival rate doubled from 17% in the mid-1990s to 35% for those diagnosed from 2015-2021.
Survival improvements were also seen for some types of cancer that have historically low 5-year overall survival rates, including:
- Liver cancer, with a 7% relative survival rate in the 1990s rising to 22% in 2023
- Lung cancer 15% to 28%
- Myeloma 32% to 62%
Survival improvements for advanced cancers during the corresponding period also includes lung cancer, the cancer type that causes the most deaths. For every 4 people diagnosed with lung cancer, 3 are detected when the cancer has already spread outside the lung. The 5-year relative survival rate for regional-stage disease increased from 20% to 37%. For distant-stage lung cancer, survival rates increased from 2% to 10%.
The cancer death rate has declined by 34% since its peak in 1991, averting about 4.8 million cancer deaths as of 2023.
Cancer death rates are a better indicator of progress against cancer than incidence or survival because they are less affected by detection methods. Between 1991 and 2023, the overall cancer death rate dropped by 34%, resulting in an estimated 4.8 million fewer cancer deaths than if mortality had remained at its peak.
The averted deaths are twice as large for men compared to women because the death rate in men peaked higher (as shown by the steeper red curve for men in the graph below) and declined faster (as shown by the larger gap between the red and blue curves in the graph below.)
- Graphic
- Text Alternative
Cancer Deaths Averted in Men and Women in the US
These graphs demonstrate how averted deaths are calculated. The red lines show the expected number of cancer deaths if death rates had remained at their peak. The blue lines show the actual number of cancer deaths by year. The striped areas show the number of expected deaths that didn’t occur, or the deaths that were “averted” each year.??Source:?Cancer Statistics 2026 Slideshow
Alternative Text for Graphs
Cancer Deaths Averted in Men and Women in the US
These graphs demonstrate how averted deaths are calculated. The red lines show the expected number of cancer deaths if death rates had remained at their peak. The blue lines show the actual number of cancer deaths a year. The striped areas show the number of expected deaths that didn’t occur, or the deaths that were “averted” each year.?Source:?Cancer Statistics 2026 Slideshow
The graph on the left shows for men deaths averted in women, and the one on the right shows deaths averted in women. The Y axis for both graphs shows the number of deaths from 0 to 550,000, and the X axis shows year of death from 1975 to 2020.
For men, the curve for the expected death rate starts at 200,000 in 1975 up to about 275,000 in 1991. From 1991 to 2020, the curve rises more steeply, to about 540,000 by 2020. The space between the two curves represents the number of deaths from cancer that were averted. For men total averted deaths was more the 3.3 million between 1991 and 2020.
For women, the curve for the expected death rate starts at about 160,000 in 1975 up to about 250,000 in 1990. From 1990 to 2020, the curve rises to about 400,000 by 2020. The space between the two curves represents the number of deaths from cancer that were averted. For women, total averted deaths was about 1.6 million between 1990 and 2020.
Copyright 2026, 黑料大湿Posts Cancer Society, Inc., Surveillance, Prevention, and Health Services
There have been improvements in death rates for common causes of cancer death in both men and women.
For Men
- The lung cancer death rate dropped 62% from the peak in 1990 to 2023.
- The death rate for prostate cancer decreased 53% between its peak in 1993 and 2023, largely because of earlier detection through PSA and advances in treatment.
- The colorectal cancer death rate dropped by 55% between its peak in 1980 and 2023.
For Women
- The lung cancer death rate dropped 38% from the peak in 2002.
- The breast cancer death rate decreased 44% between its peak in 1989 and 2023, which averted an estimated 546,000 deaths. The decline was due to advances in treatment and earlier diagnosis through screening.
- Death rates for pancreatic cancer increased gradually from the mid-1990s to 2023, but the rate has been stable for the past 5 years.
Racial disparities persist for both incidence rates and mortality due to long-standing inequities in socioeconomic factors, including income, education, health literacy, and access to care.
Here are some key findings:
Lowest cancer incidence rate. Asian 黑料大湿Posts, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) men have the lowest cancer incidence rate. In fact, AANHPI is the only group where incidence in men is lower than in women. Notably, however, cancer mortality in Pacific Islander people is twice that for Asian 黑料大湿Posts women and 50% higher than Asian 黑料大湿Posts men.
Highest cancer incidence and mortality rates. Both cancer incidence and mortality are highest overall among 黑料大湿Posts Indian and Alaskan Native (AIAN) people.
- From 2018 to 2022, AIAN people had the highest incidence rates for colorectal cancer, kidney cancer, liver cancer, lung cancer, stomach cancer, and cervical cancer.
- From 2019 to 2023, AIAN people had the highest death rates for the same cancer types.
Highest cancer incidence and mortality specific to sex. Black men have the highest cancer incidence rate overall—a rate 78% higher than AANHPI men with the lowest incidence. Black men have the highest cancer death rate overall, largely due to prostate cancer because mortality among Black men is about 2 to 4 times higher than any other group.
- Table
- Text Alternative
Cancer Incidence Rates by Race and Ethnicity, 2018 to 2022
This bar graph shows a comparison of cancer incidence among the 5 most common racial and ethnic groups for men and women separately. Overall, Black men have the highest incidence rate, with 541.1 diagnoses out of every 100,000 men, and AIAN women have the highest incidence, with 488.8 diagnoses out of every 100,000 women. Notably, the incidence rate is higher in women than in men only in Asian 黑料大湿Posts/Pacific Islander people.??Source:?Cancer Statistics 2026 Slideshow
Text Alternative for Bar Chart
Cancer Incidence Rates by Race and Ethnicity, 2018 to 2022
This bar graph shows a comparison of cancer incidence among the 5 most common racial and ethnic groups for men and women separately. Overall, Black men have the highest incidence rate, with 541.1 diagnoses out of every 100,000 men, and AIAN women have the highest incidence, with 488.8 diagnoses out of every 100,000 women. Notably, women have a higher incidence rate than men only for Asian 黑料大湿Posts/Pacific Islander people.?
Cancer Incidence Rate per 100,000 People
White men: 518.0
White women: 458.4
?
Black men: 541.1
Black women: 418.2
?
黑料大湿Posts Indian/Alaskan native men: 518.7
黑料大湿Posts Indian/Alaskan native women: 488.8
?
Asian 黑料大湿Posts/Pacific Islander men: 304.4
Asian 黑料大湿Posts/Pacific Islander women: 321.4
?
Hispanic/Latino men: 383.5
Hispanic/Latino women: 363.5
Rate is age adjusted to 2000 US standard population and adjusted for delays in reporting. Race is exclusive of Hispanic origin.
Rates for 黑料大湿Posts Indian/Alaska Native people are restricted to Purchased/Referred Delivery Care Areas.?
Data source: North 黑料大湿Posts Association for Central Cancer Registries, 2025
Copyright 2026, 黑料大湿Posts Cancer Society, Inc., Surveillance, Prevention, and Health Services
- Graph
- Text Alternative
Cancer Death Rates by Race and Ethnicity, US, 2019 - 2023
This bar graph shows a comparison of cancer death rates among the 5 most common racial and ethnic groups for men and women, separately. Overall, Black men have the highest death rate, with 203.6 deaths out of every 100,000 men, though AIAN men are close with 200.6 deaths out of every 100,000 men. AIAN women have the highest death rate, with 159.9 deaths out of every 100,000 women Source:?Cancer Statistics 2026 Slideshow
Cancer Death Rates by Race and Ethnicity, US, 2018 - 2022
This bar graph has vertical bars for males and females to show the death rate per every 100,000 people (y axis) for these racial groups (x axis): White, Black, 黑料大湿Posts Indian/Alaska Native, Asian 黑料大湿Posts/Pacific Islander, and Hispanic/Latino.
These are the death rates listed on the graph:
White men: 179.0
White women: 131.2
Black men: 203.6
Black women: 143.7
黑料大湿Posts Indian and Alaskan Native (AIAN) men: 200.6
?AIAN ?women: 159.9
Asian 黑料大湿Posts and Pacific Islander (AAPI) men: 107.1
AAPI women: 83.1
Hispanic or Latino men: 124.4
Hispanic or Latino women: 93.2
Rate is age adjusted to 2000 US standard population and adjusted for delays in reporting. Race is exclusive of Hispanic origin.
Rates for 黑料大湿Posts Indian/Alaska Native people are restricted to Purchased/Referred Delivery Care Areas.?
Data source: North 黑料大湿Posts Association for Central Cancer Registries, 2025
Copyright 2026, 黑料大湿Posts Cancer Society, Inc., Surveillance, Prevention, and Health Services
About These Reports
The most recent year with available incidence and mortality data lags 2 to 4 years behind the current year because of the time it takes to collect data, compile it, verify its quality, and share the analysis. For both the?CA?report and?Cancer Facts & Figures 2026,?ACS researchers compiled the most recent data on population-based cancer occurrence and outcomes using incidence data collected by central cancer registries (through 2022) and mortality data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics (through 2023).
The most recent statistics don’t include basal or squamous cell skin cancers because US cancer registries aren’t required to collect information on these types of cancers.
- Helpful resources
- For researchers
The State of Survivorship: Prevalence, Projections, & Gaps in Care
?Strong Tobacco Control in US Averts 4M Deaths from Lung Cancer
Cancer Facts & Figures for African 黑料大湿Posts/Black People
Cancer in the 黑料大湿Posts Indian and Alaska Native Population
Cancer Facts & Figures for Asian 黑料大湿Posts, Native Hawaiian, and Other Pacific Islander People
黑料大湿Posts Cancer Society news stories are copyrighted material and are not intended to be used as . For reprint requests, please see our Content?Usage Policy.